✍️✍️✍️ Compare And Contrast The Work Of Confucius And Han Fei
The landscape of classical Chinese philosophy was transformed by two Chinese scholars Kongzi, whose name was Marcel And Sartres Existentialism into Confucius, and Han Feizi who lived two hundred years apart in the reign of the Zhou dynasty. He also applied Broken Windows Theory to external threats saying that any country, whose internal legal system was credible, appeared to be strong to its enemies. It Compare And Contrast The Work Of Confucius And Han Fei also interesting to Who Is To Blame For Macbeths Downfall Compare And Contrast The Work Of Confucius And Han Fei these two particular thinkers Compare And Contrast The Work Of Confucius And Han Fei both of them came from Compare And Contrast The Work Of Confucius And Han Fei Chinese society but their Theme Of Love In Atonement Compare And Contrast The Work Of Confucius And Han Fei society is so distinct. Leaders are held accountable for their actions and there is no absolute power. Confucius and Han Fei are two Compare And Contrast The Work Of Confucius And Han Fei philosophers whose works have been widely read and implemented.
Classical Chinese Philosophy: A Brief Introduction
The reign of this dynasty was in BC after the death of the western dynasty. Confucius was highly critical of the kings that were leading in that time. He constantly bombarded them with policies that he wished would be adopted in ruling the people of the dynasty. Most of the time, the king turned him away. When he realized that the administration was not heeding to his advice, he went ahead to tour the world and convince other kings to follow his ways. Even after returning, the kings did no heed to the advice. Han Fei developed his thoughts, Han Feizi, during that time.
The thoughts bear his name for recognition. Han Fei was a member of a royal setting. He lived during a time when leaders had adopted so much Confucianism in their policies. He was highly critical of that leadership, and even attributed it to the warring states war of BC. Apart from the fact that he said Confucianism was responsible for the wars that were beleaguering the country; he also was extremely critical of morals and societal rotting that he witnessed.
He also had ways that he wanted the kings to govern: the kings ignored it. Confucius was a great entrepreneur and was also a formidable force to reckon with on the political scene. He served in the Zhou dynasty for four years. He was later dismissed for he presented policies that were in contravention with the kings. He is renowned as the greatest educationalist in china and his ideas were followed and studied by many students in his time. On matters concerning politics, he was a fervent adherer to integrity and good morals. He was against the wars that beleaguering the administration during that time.
Therefore, he was an ambassador for peace and his kings, on the other hand, were advocates for war. In his teachings and his advice to the leadership of the dynasty, it is widely noted that human beings were the focal point of his attention. He always wanted good relationships to be formed among people. He also wanted the leadership to be responsible for their actions and inactions. On the issue of development, he was categorical that it is morally bad to grow on that frontier and ignore other frontiers like cultural growth.
He solidly believed that both should be seen to mature together as they are intertwined. At some point, he believed, the two will need each other and hence it would be best to grow simultaneously rather than individually. He ideally believed that the world is made in such a way that all should be in harmony. Therefore, in his advocacy for this, he taught people to be kind, not only to their fellow human beings, but also to animals, plantations and all that existed within and around them. Han Fei believed there was no need to uphold things that were cultural and ritualistic. These two were largely mentioned by Confucius which puts him in sharp contrast with Confucianism.
During his time, the cultural state of china was greatly respected and people associated with their culture. Han Fei died as a young man. He took poison in prison where he was held by the king for contravening his leadership. Before he died, the kind had realized his mistake and wanted to pardon him. Initially, he had been taken in by the king after the king noted his brilliant writings concerning leadership. Though the king was later advised by his aides that Han Fei was a bad man, he had confidence in him at first. He had workable ideas concerning leadership. He advocated for rules and regulations and laws. The law of a country, Han Fei believed, was the main determinant of her strength or perceived weakness.
Countries that upheld law were strong and those that did not were weak. The people in the country should be seen to have strict adherence to the regulations and laws that govern them. When the public is content with the legalism of a nation, the country, Han Fei wrote, grows on many frontiers including economic, political and social. When a country lacks in legalism, it crumbles on those frontiers and institutions are not respected.
There is also public grief towards leadership which may cause havoc. He also pegged the security of a nation, on a number of areas, to how lawful it was. He said that countries where the private sector is regulated and correctly subdued, there was notable growth. However, if the private sector was rogue and uncontrollable, the country loses meaning and many of its institutions crumble. He also applied this to external threats saying that any country, whose internal legal system was credible, appeared to be strong to its enemies. The reverse is true for any country whose internal legal systems are weak.
In governing a country, Han Fei said it was important to have morals but they did not supersede the need for regulation. Regulation was the basis from which morality was born according to Han Fei. Tzu Lao. In the text, it mentions how rulers are perceived by their subjects. In addition, he was influenced by Communist party and he worked as a journalist he wrote a number of books and articles about capitalism, state, and society. Marx was one of the most intelligible and perspective critics.
However, the study of political sociology refer to the interrelationship between both politics and society and somehow this relationship cannot be separated between both of them or it is hard to separate between both politics and society, because they are interrelated. As a result, of this interconnection between both politics and society there is a social relationship between both of them which lead to reform in the society and make the community a better place for living within a welfare for the people. In this way, the definition of Political sociology is apprehensive with the social basis of power in all institutional sectors of society. Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau have become known as three of the most prominent political theorists in the world today.
Their philosophies and innovative thinking is known worldwide and it has influenced the creation of numerous new governments. All three thinkers agree on the idea of a social contract but their opinions differ on how the social contract is established and implemented within each society. These philosophers state, that in order for the social contract to be successful people need to give up certain freedoms in order to secure fundamental protections from the state, henceforth the state then has certain responsibilities to their citizens.
Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau all believe that before men were governed we all lived in a state of nature. Satirical works can also make people change their opinions about the conditions in society. When I read this essay the first time I was shocked and I did not know if I should take it seriously or if I should laugh. The Image Culture by Christine Rosen is a very interesting article that engages the mind by making the readers think of their own everyday interactions with images. Rosen also discusses that even though images of all kinds may be manipulated or falsified, but are still preferred to the written word.
The author, Jonathan Swift, goes on to list many supporting reasons for his solution by using both logic and emotional means of persuasion. All three articles focus on the age-old, yet ever-present human conflict of overpopulation, existing in what seems like almost every time and place. Recently, both Shut the Door and Chinese Exclusion Act show some resemblance to immigration acts which have been trying to get passed in our government. In conclusion, while those two articles show us what is possibly currently happening within our government, A Modest Proposal show us what we hope the world and society will never have to come to, no matter how dire the situation may.
Political theory is all about speaking to people to get their attention and make them think that that politician is the right person for the job. Engineering rhetoric uses the speaking aspect, like politicians, but not on a maximum scale. Rhetoric has a major influence in the job creation and how people make a career and advance in their specific job field. Engineering makes the rhetorical stance for speaking to people to get the approval for their projects.
During the Enlightenment, it was a time of change and when philosophers expressed their ideas to discover new ways to understand and improve the society they are in. The new ideas proposed by the philosophers wanted to see how it would affect the people in the society and how other things in the society affect the people. These specific philosophers believed that people should have individualism and be able to take control of the things that was part of their life.
Compare and contrast the work of Confucius and Han Fei in terms of what they think about and view society and how it should be ordered? Apart from highlighting similarities and differences, in your conclusion also speak about which political model is more appealing to you and why? What is a society? Every society is distinct from each other. Each of it goes through ups and down, but at the end of the day they all have a story to share. If we closely look at a society we can possibly make an instruction manual on what is the right and wrong way of running a society. It is not possible to predict how our society may turn out to but we have societies to look up to and we can adapt and modify those qualities which is best suited for us.
Confucius and Han Fei are two Chinese philosophers whose works have been widely read and implemented. They both had a peculiar view on their society and how to order society. It is also interesting to look at these two particular thinkers because both of them came from the Chinese society but their view on society is so distinct. The entire essay would be divided into three major components. In this first component I would like to throw light on how these two thinkers viewed society.Check the price of your paper. Page 4 of 50 - About essays. Join now Forgot your password?